We are excited to announce that Mattermark has re-launched as an independent company! Learn More →
Back to All Articles  |  Editorial

66% Of 2016 Tech IPOs Are Under Their First Day Close, Falling An Average Of 30% From Highs

Editor’s Morning Note: 2016 tech IPOs are off nearly a third from their highs, which may raise a hackle or two.1


I carefully cropped out the ‘2015’ in this image. Pretend it says 2016.

This year’s tech IPOs have shed nearly 30 percent of their value from their respective peaks, a larger figure than this publication expected given record-highs in the markets and increasing chatter that things are looking up for flotations.

2015 went down as a dismal year for tech IPOs, a concept that looks nearly cute compared to the disappointment that is tech IPO frequency this year.

Regardless, the narrative is changing slightly. Put on your nerd caps. We’re going in.

The Prior Narrative

Tech IPOs started off the year not even crawling, although the pace slowly accelerated through the year through to the start of October. Cadence increased to such a point that these pages were forced to consecrate an IPO Week, an essentially paga-capitalistic bacchanal involving both coasts and many wallets.

Starting with 2015’s tech IPOs, the following are good outlines.

January 21:


January 28:


It wasn’t great.

In contrast, in the first and second quarter, it seemed that this year’s crop of IPOs was going to set records for being sparse, instead of bad. Regardless of initial pace, however, there has been some warmth to the cycle. Here is an excerpt from our prior efforts:


You can compare that headline to the first shared in the body of this piece, and then the current headline of this piece and understand why we’re having a chat.

The Current Narrative

Things are a bit less good now. Getting to the numbers with speed, at the current tip, the 2016 US-based tech IPO group is up just 15.35 percent from its first day close, as an averaged group.

That number, while down from our prior notes of a larger 33 percent gain, is positive nearly all due to the results of a single company. Acacia Communications’ amazing IPO run has seen its shares soar from an IPO price of $23 to a first-day close of $30.95 to a current price of $88.47. If you remove it from our first-day-to-today comparison, 2016’s tech IPOs are actually down 5.96 percent as a group from their first day close average.

Here’s what that looks like small rectangles:



(Note that six of the nine 2016 US-based tech IPOs are currently trading under their first day close.)

Things get worse if you make the comparisons steeper, unsurprisingly. Let’s get mean.

Companies trade below their trailing 52-week high, unless they are setting a new record that day. Therefore, most companies are under their own 52-week high at any given moment. As such, groups of companies will always trade below their respective 52-week highs.

Keep that in mind for the following, which tracks the average percent decline among our group of companies:

screen-shot-2016-10-26-at-9-50-14-am screen-shot-2016-10-26-at-9-50-20-am


The Closing Narrative

Racing to an end so that you can get back to avoiding email, it seems that the initial performance of this year’s IPOs was bolstered by the breakout performance of Acacia Communications, a fact that we could have corrected for at times. That’s on me.

Still, only one 2016 offering is down from its initial IPO price: SecureWorks. The rest are up. So, from that perspective, they are winners. Perhaps just not as big as we had thought.

After all, when you ask for seconds:


  1. No, Iron Maiden fans. Put your irons down.

Join thousands of business professionals reading the Mattermark Daily newsletter. A daily digest of timely, must-read posts by investors and operators.

© Mattermark 2024. Sources: Mattermark Research, Crunchbase, AngelList.