We are excited to announce that Mattermark has re-launched as an independent company! Learn More →
Back to All Articles

Take Me Home Tonight: Comparing Uber, Lyft, Sidecar, and Chariot

Uber’s jump in reported valuation piqued our interest around the office. It took 18 days for Uber’s valuation to rise from an estimated $10 billion to a reported $17 billion. They have yet to close the round. With the flurry of press surrounding the fundraising, the team at Mattermark expects Uber’s Mattermark Score to increase due to a rise in Twitter mentions and web traffic.

The Mattermark Score is an average of all weekly momentum scores. A positive score indicates growth, a score closer to zero indicates a plateau, and a negative score indicates a declining online footprint.

We used Mattermark data to determine which four transportation startups gained the most momentum in May. Contextualizing the competition, Uber and Lyft are widely seen as the top competitors; Sidecar’s $10m Series B pales in comparison to Uber’s current $307.5 million raised or Lyft’s $332.5 million. Then there’s Chariot, a newcomer to the Bay Area that is picking up speed.

*

Mattermark Score

Uber: 1,794
Lyft: 1,425
Sidecar: 322
Chariot: 437

Uber’s score peaked on December 14th of last year, but it’s hovered between 1,700 and 1,800 ever since. This score indicates that Uber is gaining—and continuing to gain attention online. For one metric, let’s look at Uber’s Twitter mentions:

Uber Twitter Mentions
copyright Mattermark © 2015 (Source: Mattermark Research, Source: Crunchbase, Source: AngelList)

Now let’s compare that to Lyft’s Twitter mentions:

Lyft Twitter Mentions
copyright Mattermark © 2015 (Source: Mattermark Research, Source: Crunchbase, Source: AngelList)

Check out the Y axis. Uber gets over 155% of the attention that Lyft gets.

Sidecar Twitter Mentions UPDATED
copyright Mattermark © 2015 (Source: Mattermark Research, Source: Crunchbase, Source: AngelList)

In comparison, let’s look at the attention generated by Sidecar. The first peak occurred the week of February 23rd, coinciding with Fred Wilson’s announcement that USV would invest in Sidecar. The second peak took place the week that the Wall Street Journal declared Sidecar the winner in a competition with Uber, Lyft, and a traditional taxi service based on price and time.

Sidecar Job Openings UPDATED
copyright Mattermark © 2015 (Source: Mattermark Research, Source: Crunchbase, Source: AngelList)

Sidecar hasn’t generated many headlines since the article’s publication. We consider the steep decline in Sidecar job openings to be the most eye-opening indicator of the company’s growth prospects.

Chariot Twitter Followers Updated 2
copyright Mattermark © 2015 (Source: Mattermark Research, Source: Crunchbase, Source: AngelList)

But what about Chariot, the “Chestnut Bullet” operating between the Marina and Downtown? As a new company, it’s comparatively easier for Chariot to generate growth than for Sidecar. Still, we found it telling that Chariot had a higher Mattermark Score than Sidecar (437 vs. 322) only a few months after raising $10 million in a round led by Union Square Ventures. Chariot’s monthly uniques are growing quickly week-over-week and the number of Twitter followers has increased by over 160% in a month’s time:

Obviously this kind of growth is easier to capture at first. Chariot’s service—a shuttle between well-to-do neighborhoods and popular downtown destinations—can easily scale to more neighborhoods and cities. We’ll continue to keep a close eye on it. And while it appears that the wheels are falling off of Sidecar, the company has the capital to survive if it can reestablish its value proposition.

Photo courtesy of StreetsBlog SF.

© Mattermark 2024. Sources: Mattermark Research, Crunchbase, AngelList.
Shares